AEJMC Network

Networking Home for Divisions and Interest Groups

Shared web space for AEJMC DIGs

  • Home
  • Membership
    • Members Sites
    • FAQs
    • Contact Us
  • WordPress
    • An overview
    • Terms of use
    • User privilege levels
      • Administrator policy
      • Administrator agreement
    • WordPress security
    • Lost password
    • WordPress themes
      • Maintaining appearances
    • WordPress plugins
    • Posting video
    • WordPress news & facts

Archives for February 2017

Tips from the AEJMC Teaching Committee

February 23, 2017 by Kyshia

Facilitating a Conversation about Race

By Karen M. Turner
AEJMC Standing Committee on Teaching
Associate Professor
Department of Journalism
Temple University
kturner@temple.edu

 

 

 

(Article courtesy of AEJMC News, March 2017 issue)

I often hear from colleagues who say talking about diversity, and race in particular, is difficult. However, by being silent about race in the classroom, our students may take this as a cue that such discussions should be avoided. Our political environment has provided us with a challenge and opportunity to bring hot-button topics into our classrooms in meaningful ways. Whether we’re talking about the Black Lives Matter movement or police shootings and killings or racial and religious refugees, the news is filled with politicized issues ripe for discussion.

Several years ago I developed and began teaching a module to upper-level students, dealing with journalistic biases, as a way to contextualize a race/diversity discussion. We need to have conversations about race so we can improve the way we report about communities of color. We teach our journalists-in-training to strive for objectivity. But the reality is we see the world through our own eyes and experiences – our various dimensions of diversity such as race, class, ability, age, political affiliation, sexual orientation, etc. We need to recognize our biases. And we need to help our students as future communication professionals do the same. Such understanding can lead to better reporting. Knowing one’s biases in this context can foster a critical analysis of how identity impacts journalistic storytelling. I am not suggesting one module devoted to this difficult topic is adequate. I am suggesting it is a start.

Create a positive classroom climate. I usually wait to teach the race module midway through the semester. By this point in the course we are familiar and comfortable with one another. As instructor, I work to create a welcoming classroom climate where all points of view are valued and open for critical reflection.

Explain why we need to have conversations about race. It is important early in the discussion to explain to the students why I introduce what could be for some an uncomfortable conversation. My reasons are simple:
• the student population and the population they will serve as journalists are becoming more and more diverse;
• we need to function in an increasingly multicultural workplace;
• as a society we don’t do race-talk well but it’s important for developing racial consciousness, improving race relations and for our purposes better reporting;
• honest race talk is a powerful way to dispel stereotypes and biases*;
• I am committed to stepping outside my comfort zone to facilitate difficult conversations.

Once I say why it is important to bring a race discussion into the curriculum, I set ground rules and discuss what I hope to accomplish. There are three main objectives:
• begin an honest dialogue about race;
• avoid a monologue where we state and restate our initial positions – LISTEN;
• recognize/understand our own biases and how they may impact our reporting.

Exercise 1: I begin by asking the students to list all the dimensions of diversity that explain who they are. I get things started by describing myself. When students see I am willing to share, it encourages them to take the exercise seriously. I don’t ask the students to talk publicly about their list. I tell them to keep the list and add to it throughout the rest of the semester.

Discuss our racial realities. At this point I discuss and show verdict video from the 1995 O.J. Simpson trial demonstrating how Americans saw this story very differently depending on their racial background. Journalist Ted Koppel said about the trial… “I think that race is the great unresolved issue in this country. … And in many respects, the O.J. Simpson trial, coming as it did toward the end of the 20th Century, served as an exclamation mark.”

Exercise 2: For the second exercise, I assign the students to diverse groups of three or four. I ask them to think about the following question then share their answers with their group. “Write a few words describing when and what happened the first time you became aware of your racial/ethnic identity. This can be a personal experience or something you witnessed. How do you think this event has influenced your present attitudes about race and race-related issues? How might this impact your reporting?” As the students are getting into their groups I share with them my first racial awareness memory, which happened in kindergarten. Many students have never thought about these questions before. They usually become very engaged to the point that I have to cut short the group discussions.

Encourage quality reporting. I end the module talking about storytelling approaches to keep in mind when reporting, such as being mindful of visuals used; word choices; who’s interviewed and who’s not; and framing the story. Following the module, I distribute an anonymous (name optional) three-question survey to be submitted by the next class. I ask: (1) In what ways, if any, has your thinking or awareness of race and stereotypes changed? (2) To what extent have these activities and discussion made you reflect on your own position and identity in society? (3) In what ways, if any, have or will these activities and discussion impact your approach to reporting? The feedback has been positive and informative.

Challenge ourselves to step outside our comfort zone. It can be uncomfortable teaching a race module. However our students must have the tools to report accurately on issues related to race. This process starts in our classrooms where we can help our students understand, recognize and address journalistic biases. Honest and accurate reporting in this climate of “fake” news is imperative. I often tell my students they will be the eyes and ears of their public and therefore have an awesome responsibility to produce quality journalism. I remind them our democracy depends on it.

*A good resource is Derald Wing Sue’s, Race Talk and the Conspiracy of Silence: Understanding and Facilitating Difficult Dialogues on Race. Also see my 2015 commentary, “Journalists’ Biases Must Be Part of Frank Conversation on Race” (http://mije.org/journalists%E2%80%99-biases-must-be-part-frank-conversation-race)

Teaching Corner

Filed Under: Uncategorized

AEJMC Presidential Statement to President Donald Trump

February 9, 2017 by Kyshia

CONTACT: Paul Voakes, University of Colorado, 2016-17 President of AEJMC | February 9, 2017

Dear President Trump,

As the leaders of organizations representing more than 8,600 journalism and communication educators throughout the country, we hope you will join us in supporting the longstanding, democratic principles that inform our teaching and our research:

· We strongly support the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.  Its guarantee of freedom of speech has resulted in a nation whose public debates and tolerance for diverse viewpoints are unmatched in world history. We believe that freedom of expression, as many before us have asserted, “is the right from which all others flow.”

· We believe the First Amendment compels the news media to hold accountable those
in power – especially those leading the U.S. government. Without this “watchdog”
function, American citizens will not have the broad sweep of information they need for
successful self-governance. This in turn requires transparency and accessibility on the
part of those in government.

· We believe in the discipline of verification. As our colleagues Bill Kovach and Tom
Rosenstiel have written, verification “is what separates journalism from entertainment,
propaganda, fiction or art. . . . Journalism alone is focused on the process employed to
get what happened down right.” We value the gathering of evidence-based information
over the superficial parroting of opposing claims.

· We support the teaching of news literacy – not just to journalism students but to all
students. As young citizens and future leaders, our students must be able to discern
fabrication from fact, to evaluate the evidence and sources of claims, to recognize the
inevitable biases in themselves and in others, and to understand the economics of news
media and all public communications. We believe the American public deserves journalism that is factual and balanced, and we are preparing future professionals to provide it.

– We support debate and dialogue that is both robust and civil.  While the First Amendment protects freedom of expression in its many forms, the norms of a civil society also necessitate that we treat others with decency and respect – even those with whom we disagree.

These are traditional and time-honored principles of journalism and communication
education that we feel have been recently threatened by the rhetoric of your administration. In your campaign and during your transition to the presidency, you and your leadership team have made references to changes both logistical (relocation of the White House press corps, among many others) and conceptual (“opening up the libel laws” to make it easier to sue the media, among many others), which together signal a potential erosion of important First Amendment freedoms that are essential to our democracy. You have stated that you have a “running war” with the news media, and you have declared journalists to be “among the most dishonest human beings on earth.” In the first days of your presidency your administration shut down systems of communication between the several key federal agencies and the public.

In fairness, we also recognize that the Obama administration had a less than stellar record of accessibility, transparency and accountability, in its own relations with news media. But we have now turned a page in U.S. history. We urge you and your administration to set an example — indeed, the benchmark — of transparency, accessibility and accountability, and to encourage and support journalism in its important watchdog role.

As educators, we have long used current events and trends for “teachable moments”
and for research topics. We are using this moment to restate the value of journalism and encourage our students to pursue it as a noble profession that can enlighten and inform.

We urge you and your administration vigorously to protect and preserve the First Amendment rights of journalists and all citizens – rights that are basic to democracy and an informed society.  We will also continue vigorously to defend these principles.

Sincerely,

The Boards of Directors:

Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication
National Scholastic Press Association/Associated Collegiate Press
Journalism Education Association
Student Press Law Center

<<PACS

Filed Under: Uncategorized

AEJMC Network

"AEJMC Network" is the name given to the server space shared by official bodies of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication.

Search

RSS AEJMC Job Postings

Genesis Theme Support by WebPresence · Copyright © 2026 AEJMC · Log in