Favorite comm things

To celebrate CT&M’s 50th anniversary as a division at AEJMC, we want to hear about your favorite communication-related theories, methodologies, concepts, etc. Feel free to list your favorite communication-related published papers, books, and even popular-culture movies, books, and TV series that address communication-related themes and issues. You may post a comment to this Facebook post with your favorites listed. Yes, you can post more than one. Or, you can email Kristen Landreville at klandrev@uwyo.edu with your favorites. The CT&M Summer Newsletter will include a list of our members’ favorite things in communication!

Kristen’s picks are The Social Network and Spotlight. Can’t wait to see yours! Thanks for your participation.

CT&M top papers for AEJMC in August

Congratulations to all who had manuscripts accepted for presentation at AEJMC in Minneapolis in August! If you’re headed to the conference, you might want to check out CT&M’s top papers. Here are the abstracts for our open call and student paper competitions.

Open call winners:

A Meta-Analysis of News Media’s Agenda-Setting Effects, 1972-2015 • Yunjuan Luo; Hansel Burley, Texas Tech University; Alexander Moe, Texas Tech University; Mingxiao Sui • This project involved exploring the agenda-setting hypothesis across a range of studies using rigorous meta-analytic approaches. The researchers drew upon empirical agenda-setting studies published from 1972 to 2015, and 67 studies that met the inclusion criteria for analysis produced a moderate grand mean effect size of .487. A multiple regression analysis revealed significant predictors, most notably was the predictor that classified the basis for the study correlation as either the number of content categories or the number of participants. A multiple regression of a subgroup using text analysis produced homogeneity (non-significance). The mean for these studies was .51. This is an indication of consistency in findings across agenda setting studies. Study limitations and suggestions for future research are also discussed in the article.

Agreement between Humans and Machines? — A Reliability Check among Computational Content Analysis Programs • Jacob Rohde, Boston University; Denis Wu • As data generated from social networking sites become larger, so does the need for computer aids in content analysis research. This paper outlines the growing methodology of supervised machine learning in respect to document topics classification and sentiment analysis. A series of tweets were collected, coded by humans, and subsequently fed into a selection of six different popular computer applications: Aylien, DiscoverText, MeaningCloud, Semantria, Sentiment 140, and SentiStrength. Reliability results between the human and machine coders are presented in a matrix in terms of Krippendorff’s Alpha and percentage agreement. Ultimately, this paper illuminates that, while computer-aided coding may lessen the burden and accelerate for researchers in coding social media content, the results of utilizing these programs indicate low reliability for analyzing political content.

Evaluating a sexual health text message service using short message service (SMS) surveys with adolescents • Jessica Willoughby; Kelly L’Engle, University of San Francisco; Kennon Jackson; Jared Brickman • Two-way mHealth interventions allow for feedback solicitation from participants. This study explores the use of a text-message survey to assess demographics and program feedback from users of an adolescent sexual health text message question-and-answer service. The text message survey achieved a 43.9% response rate. When compared to respondents who used the service and completed an online in-school questionnaire, text survey respondents were more likely to be female and older. They also reported higher service satisfaction.

Student competition winners:

Defying censorship: A framework for reactance and learning in the face of media controls • Golnoosh Behrouzian; Emma Fete; Aysenur Dal • Media censorship is a significant issue plaguing over 80 percent of the world’s population. This suppression of information can have damaging consequences for the public’s knowledge base and negatively impact the capability of citizens to make well-informed decisions, by withholding information or creating misperceptions, amongst other things. While most research addresses the implications of censorship from a more normative institutional level, we propose a novel theoretical framework looking at the individual-level effects of perceived censorship on political knowledge. Through the integration of psychological reactance as a mediating variable, we use data from a two-wave longitudinal survey, taken by Turkish citizens before the June 2015 general election, to conduct an exploratory study of the underlying psychological and communication processes that may motivate increased political learning. We find that those citizens who perceive a threat to their media freedom are more likely to experience psychological reactance, which heightens their level of political learning. Our results both challenge and expand on previous findings that suggest censorship broadly dampens political knowledge, since the boundary condition provided by psychological reactance suggests that higher levels of perceived censorship may, in fact, motivate higher achievement in knowledge. We discuss the implication of these findings as it relates to information-seeking strategies that may further clarify how individuals in repressed media environments manage their media freedom.

“The First Decision for My Child”: Mechanisms through which Parents of Children with and without Autism Decide on Their Children’s Vaccination • Juwon Hwang, University of Wisconsin – Madison • Based on O1-S-O2-R model, this study explores the mechanisms through which parents decide on their children’s vaccination. Analyzing nationally representative survey data, this study assumes that the evaluation of health information sources plays a critical role in parents’ benefit perception and decisions on their children’s vaccination. This study finds that print and interpersonal communication as stimuli are positively associated with parents’ benefit perception of their children’s vaccination whereas social media is negatively associated with it. In turn, benefit perception is significantly related to parents’ decisions on their children’s vaccination. However, there is no interaction effect of parents of children with autism (PCA) and the evaluation of health information sources on parents’ benefit perception and decisions on their children’s vaccination. The results seem to suggest that targeted messages addressing PCA’s concerns and to mitigate mistrust are needed.

Testing Intergenerational Transmission of News Content Preference: A South Korean Case • Minchul Kim, Indiana University • Understanding of how adolescents develop news preference is closely associated with understanding of how a democratic society works. This study tested the intergenerational transmission of news content preference between parents and adolescents. Specifically, our findings suggest that mothers’ news content preference, but not that of fathers’, had independent and lasting influences on adolescents’ news content preference. This implies that mothers may play a more direct role in the intergenerational transmission of news content preference than do fathers.

CT&M Spring 2016 Newsletter

The spring 2016 edition of CT&M CONCEPTS is available now!

Check it out for these featured items and more:

  • Advice for scholars from Jack McLeod
  • The CT&M program for the AEJMC conference in Minneapolis this fall
  • A call for papers for AEJMC 2016
  • A call for Barrow Minority Scholarship applications
  • A note from the 2015 winner of the Barrow Minority Scholarship

You can download the newsletter here.

CT&M Summer 2015 Newsletter

Just in time for the AEJMC 2015 conference, our CT&M Summer 2015 Newsletter is here.

Some highlights:

  • Celebrate CT&M’s 50th anniversary with us! Join us at the best-of-CT&M session from 5:15 p.m. to 6:45 p.m. Saturday, Aug. 8. CT&M Lifetime Achievement award winner Jack McLeod will serve as discussant.
  • Jörg Matthes will serve as the next editor-in-chief of CMM. He is the current research chair of CT&M and current associate editor of CMM.
  • We are still waiting to hear the results of our bid for ISI listing. Please visit our business meeting (Sat. Aug. 8 @ 7 p.m.), immediately after the best-of-CT&M session, for the most recent news.
  • Our paper submissions increased from 79 papers in 2014 to 99 papers in 2015. There was a 50% acceptance rate in 2015, compared to 57% in 2014.
  • We will distribute awards for the top papers and Barrow Minority Scholarship award at the business meeting. Congrats to all of the winners!
  • There are two PF&R panels:
    1. The first panel, “Exploring Collaborative
      Opportunities for Accessing Data,” will
      explore methods for accessing data for political
      and public opinion research.
    2. The second panel, “The Unbearable Filteredness
      of Being Online: Customization and the Media
      We Consume,” will explore ethical, business, and
      research implications related to the customization
      of content enabled by machine-based customization,
      filtering, message tailoring, network
      structure, etc.
  • There are two teaching panels:
    1. Academia 2.0, when professors become public
      intellectuals: benefits and detriments
    2. Theories Redux: Which defy time? How do others
      hold in the face of new communication contexts?
  • Download the newsletter for a complete listing of award winners and the CT&M session schedule for the conference.

CMM Special Call: Communication Exposure in a Changing Environment

Communication Exposure in a Changing Environment

Call for papers for special issue of Communication Methods and Measures
Edited by Claes de Vreese & Peter Neijens
The Amsterdam School of Communication Research ASCoR
University of Amsterdam

The measurement of how people are ‘exposed’ to media content, which is crucial for the understanding of media use and media effects, has been a challenge for a long time. On the one hand, today’s media landscape in which individuals are exposed to messages anytime, anywhere from a great variety of sources on an increasing number of different platforms has complicated the measurement of media exposure even more. On the other hand, the new digital media offer also new possibilities to map media exposure by means of passive measurement.

CMM_image

Our current thinking about exposure stems from a time with clearly demarcated media types, platforms, and limited choice. We propose that it is valuable to consider the term communication exposure as a heuristic for understanding, at a broader level, that exposure can entail exposure to different media, on different platforms, with different contents, in different combinations. As many of the distinctions between media blur, the concept of communication exposure may offer a more encompassing and comprehensive framework. This will have serious implications for our measurement of exposure.

In this special issue we invite submissions that deal with the conceptualization and measurement of exposure. These can be both theoretical and empirical in nature.

In the opening article, we identify recent developments in the way in which communication exposure is measured and we evaluate their strengths and weaknesses. We provide an overview of the development in published research in the major journals in the past decade drawing on media exposure measures. We also introduce a research tool for media exposure measurement and conclude with a research agenda for issues that need to be tackled in future research.

Submissions should follow CM&M submission guidelines, including the use of APA format, and should be submitted through the submission portal at

http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/cmm

All manuscripts will undergo initial review by the editors and subsequent peer review. Manuscripts are due by June 1, 2015. In the cover letter, please indicate that you are submitting for consideration in the special issue on exposure.

 

Spring 2014 Newsletter

Our Spring 2014 Newsletter is ready. Here are some highlights: Download it here!

  • Call for Papers for Montreal 2014
  • CT&M Programming for 2014 — Including the Pre-conference, Members’ Meeting, Teaching Sessions, and PF&R Session
  • Pre-conference Summary — It’s About Big Data and How to Transform it to Structured, Usable Formats
  • An Interesting, Brief Story of CT&M Origins
  • Call for Barrow Minority Scholarship Applications
  • CMM Special Issue Paper Call — “Questionable Research and Publication Practices in Communication Science”